The car wasn’t that hot, but we wanted to see how well Zero Breeze worked. We eventually drained them on the way back home. So we had no reason to drain the rest of our batteries. Though, in the case of the cabin, we could plug it into a wall outlet. We made a stop at a cabin on the way back, and the device was just as useful in that setting. The fact that it did not require a stationary power source made this possible. Our first-hand encounter-Where did we use Zero Breeze?Īs you might have guessed, we initially took the AC camping. One assumes that the second version will do the same. The first version had its problems, but it exceeded all expectations as far as the sales are concerned. This one will have a BTU of 2,300 and a sleeker design. They are planning to release a more powerful version of their AC showcased as the Zero Breeze Mark 2. These complaints and more should have ruined the company.īut Zero Breeze Mark 1 customer service listened to the feedback seen on Amazon com and went back to the drawing board. Not only was the unit heavy, but it was far more expensive than brands with superior output.
#ZERO BREEZE REVIEW AMAZON PORTABLE#
The battery-powered portable air conditioner running time was just two hours, which meant that you couldn’t use it throughout the night. This was not the case as many of its competitors were running at 5,000 BTU’s or even higher.Ĭustomer service recieved a plethora of service tickets for the drain port had a defect, which caused the water to miss the water tube, pooling on the floor.
For instance, even though it claimed to be the coolest portable AC on the market at 1,100 BTU’s. Most of the feedback highlighted design failures and battery pack life. As the product eventually succumbed to bad reviews and complaints. At launch, Zero Breeze Mark 1 was praised as a disruptive product, yet this praise was not to be sustained.
0 kommentar(er)
